Loving v. Virginia, 388 You.S. 1 (1967)

Loving v. Virginia, 388 You.S. 1 (1967)

A beneficial unanimous Judge struck off county statutes banning wedding between someone of different racing, holding why these anti-miscegenation statutes broken the Owed Processes additionally the Equal Coverage Clauses of your own Fourteenth Modification.

Eg sixteen most other South states, Virginia enforced a legislation one banned ericans. Richard and you may Mildred Loving, a light man and you can an enthusiastic African-Western woman, partnered in Washington, D.C. to end the usage of Virginia’s anti-miscegenation laws, known as the Racial Ethics Operate off 1924. They returned to Virginia, however, where cops found them in identical bed in their home in the evening. Into the raid, the authorities located the newest couple’s relationship certificate inside their bedroom.

So it file became the cornerstone getting violent charge from the Lovings underneath the anti-miscegenation rules and an associated statute. There was zero demonstration, simply because they pleaded responsible and you may gotten a choice ranging from investing one to year from klikkaa tГ¤tГ¤ sivustoa inside the jail otherwise making the official for the next twenty-five age. This new Lovings went back into this new Area off Columbia however, soon located themselves looking to return to Virginia. From inside the 1964, 5 years immediately following its conviction, Mrs. Loving contacted the fresh new ACLU thru Lawyer Standard Robert F. Kennedy. This situation emerged if ACLU sought so you’re able to vacate brand new view and set away brand new sentence, just like the Lovings including submitted a hobby in the government courtroom. Its claims have been read from the Virginia Ultimate Court, which modified the fresh phrase however, verified brand new convictions.

  • Earl Warren (Author)
  • Hugo Lafayette Black
  • William Orville Douglas
  • Tom C. Clark
  • John Marshall Harlan II
  • William Joseph Brennan, Jr.
  • Byron Raymond White
  • Abe Fortas

Fairness Warren don’t accept Virginia’s dispute one to position equal penalties to your partners of every race produced what the law states low-discriminatory. The guy pointed out that legislation don’t criminalize matrimony anywhere between people of a couple low-white races, which advised so it had a light supremacist inspiration. There’s no other legitimate mission that will validate so it law otherwise one someone else think its great, Warren kept, because it infringed up on might proper of marriage.

  • Potter Stewart (Author)

Enjoying v. Virginia, 388 You.S. step 1 (1967)

Mostly echoing Warren’s cause, Stewart simply had written an additional thoughts because the an indication which he had advocated striking off anti-miscegenation legislation during the a young opnion throughout the case of McLaughlin v. Florida.

This is actually the perfect instance of a statute that’s discriminatory with the the face because it turns battle, a secure class, into the among elements of a crime. Extremely discriminatory rules are in fact presented so much more discreetly. The choice is even recognized as it categorizes ental liberties one to was protected by new Fourteenth Amendment.

Virginia’s legal program to stop marriage ceremonies between individuals entirely into base from racial categories kept so you’re able to violate the fresh new Equivalent Defense and you can Owed Process Conditions of one’s Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 388 U. S. 4 -12.

U.S. Ultimate Judge

Virginia’s legal strategy to prevent marriage ceremonies anywhere between individuals solely with the base out of racial categories held so you’re able to violate the brand new Equal Coverage and Due Procedure Clauses of your Fourteenth Modification. Pp. 388 You. S. 4 -12.

This situation merchandise an effective constitutional concern never addressed from this Court: if or not a legal program accompanied by County from Virginia so you can avoid marriage ceremonies between persons exclusively on the basis of racial categories violates the new Equal Safety and Due Techniques Conditions of the Fourteenth Modification. [Footnote 1] Having causes and this frequently me to reflect the brand new central definition of them constitutional sales, i end that these laws cannot sit continuously toward Fourteenth Amendment.

Inside Summer, 1958, a couple owners off Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a great Negro lady, and Richard Loving, a light man, was married on the Section from Columbia pursuant in order to its laws and regulations. After their relationships, brand new Lovings returned to Virginia and you may built the marital property from inside the Caroline Condition. From the Oct Identity, 1958, of one’s Circuit Courtroom


發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *